Regular Free Updates CAMS-FCI Dumps Real Exam Questions Test Engine Jul 29, 2024 [Q18-Q36]

Regular Free Updates CAMS-FCI Dumps Real Exam Questions Test Engine Jul 29, 2024

Practice Test Questions Verified Answers As Experienced in the Actual Test!

NEW QUESTION # 18
An analyst reviews an alert for high volume Automated Clearing House (ACH) activity in an account. The analyst's initial research finds the account is for a commercial daycare account that receives high volumes of large government-funded ACH transactions to support the programs. The account activity consists of checks (cheques) made payable to individual names in varying dollar amounts. One check indicates rent to another business.
An Internet search finds that the daycare company owner has previous government-issued violations for safety and classroom size needs, such as not having enough chairs and tables per enrollee. These violations were issued to a different daycare name.
Simultaneous to this investigation, another analyst sends an email about negative news articles referencing local child/adult daycare companies misusing governmental grants. This prompts the financial institution (Fl) to search all businesses for names containing daycare' or 'care1. Text searches return a number of facilities as customers at the Fl and detects that three of these businesses have a similar transaction flow of high volume government ACH funding with little to no daycare expenses.
During the investigation, it was determined that some of the checks were issued to a mother-in-law of a PEP and deposited into her account with the Fl. This customer was not found on the Fl's PEP list How should the investigator proceed in this situation"? (Select Two.)

• A. Send a referral to Sanctions/List Screening, or similar department/responsible individual, to ensure that the customer due diligence information is up to date.
• B. Conduct the investigation as usual, since the activity in question is not directly connected to the PEP.
• C. File a SAR/STR due to the potential involvement of a PEP.
• D. Use this case as an example to train employees to recognize potential PEPs during their investigation process.
• E. Reter the newly identified customers account for closure due to the high risk associated with the potential PEP.

Answer: A,B

Explanation:
Explanation
The investigator should proceed in this situation by conducting the investigation as usual, since the activity in question is not directly connected to the PEP (A) and sending a referral to Sanctions/List Screening, or similar department/responsible individual, to ensure that the customer due diligence information is up to date (D).
These actions are appropriate and prudent, as they allow the investigator to continue their analysis of the suspicious activity without being biased by the potential PEP status of the customer's relative, and they ensure that the FI has accurate and current information about its customers and their associates. According to the ACAMS Advanced Financial Crimes Investigations Certification Study Guide1, "the FI should conduct enhanced due diligence on all parties involved in the investigation, including checking various sources of information, such as watch lists, sanctions lists, negative news, and official registries" (p. 24). The FI should also "update the customer profile with any new information obtained during the investigation" (p. 25).
The other options are not correct. The investigator should not refer the newly identified customer's account for closure due to the high risk associated with the potential PEP (B), as this could be premature or disproportionate, as well as potentially discriminatory or illegal. The investigator should not file a SAR/STR due to the potential involvement of a PEP (E), as this could also be premature or unnecessary, as well as potentially misleading or inaccurate. The investigator should not use this case as an example to train employees to recognize potential PEPs during their investigation process , as this could violate confidentiality or data protection laws, as well as compromise the investigation or alert the customer or their relative of the suspicion.
References: 1: ACAMS Advanced Financial Crimes Investigations Certification Study Guide, available at ACAMS

NEW QUESTION # 19
Due to an ever-diversifying business model and multi-jurisdictional footprint, a casino has decided to outsource the source of funds and wealth checks to a third-party provider. Why is it important for the casino to maintain control of the output from the provider?

• A. Clients of the casino prefer to know that the casino is keeping their information secure when being held by a third-party.
• B. As with all third-party relationships, proper control must be maintained to ensure profitability.
• C. The casino maintains ultimate responsibility for this activity and should maintain control to avoid non-compliance.
• D. Other casinos are frequently looking to reduce costs and share ideas, so if this relationship is successful, the model can be used by other businesses.

Answer: C

Explanation:
Explanation
The reason why it is important for the casino to maintain control of the output from the provider is that the casino maintains ultimate responsibility for this activity and should maintain control to avoid non-compliance
. This is because the casino is accountable for its own AML/CFT obligations and cannot delegate or outsource them to a third-party provider. According to the ACAMS Advanced Financial Crimes Investigations Certification Study Guide1, "the FI should ensure that it has adequate oversight and control over any third-party providers that it engages for AML/CFT purposes, such as conducting due diligence, verifying information, or monitoring transactions" (p. 25). The FI should also "review and evaluate the performance and quality of the third-party providers on a regular basis, and address any issues or gaps that may arise" (p. 25).
The other options are not as relevant or accurate as option C. The clients of the casino prefer to know that the casino is keeping their information secure when being held by a third-party (A) is not a reason why the casino should maintain control of the output from the provider, but rather a customer expectation or preference. As with all third-party relationships, proper control must be maintained to ensure profitability (B) is not a reason why the casino should maintain control of the output from the provider, but rather a general business principle or objective. Other casinos are frequently looking to reduce costs and share ideas, so if this relationship is successful, the model can be used by other businesses (D) is not a reason why the casino should maintain control of the output from the provider, but rather a potential benefit or outcome.

NEW QUESTION # 20
Which scenarios are common to money laundering through online marketplaces and trade-based money laundering? (Select Two.)

• A. Frequent conversion of foreign currency
• B. Use of multiple freight forwarding or export companies
• C. Over-valuation of the stated price of goods
• D. No evidence of delivery of goods or shipping expenses
• E. Use of fraudulent letters of credit

Answer: C,D

Explanation:
Explanation
Money laundering through online marketplaces and trade-based money laundering both involve the manipulation of the value or quantity of goods to disguise the illicit origin of funds. Over-valuation of the stated price of goods and no evidence of delivery of goods or shipping expenses are two common indicators of such schemes. The other options are not specific to these methods of money laundering.
References: Advanced CAMS-FCI Study Guide, page 29-30.

NEW QUESTION # 21
Which is a key characteristic of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) Regional Style Bodies for combatting money laundering/terrorist financing?

• A. Instructing each member country to place FATF recommendations into law
• B. Emphasizing regional co-operation between member countries
• C. Enabling FATF standards to be specific to each region
• D. Implementing regional mutual evaluation procedures

Answer: D

Explanation:
Explanation
According to the CAMS study guide, the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) Regional Style Bodies are organizations created by the FATF to promote the implementation of anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) measures in specific regions. One of the key characteristics of these bodies is the implementation of regional mutual evaluation procedures.
Regional mutual evaluations involve member countries evaluating each other's AML/CFT regimes to identify strengths and weaknesses and to develop best practices for improvement. This process allows for greater cooperation between countries and can help to identify and address regional AML/CFT risks more effectively.
It also promotes consistency in AML/CFT standards and practices within the region.

NEW QUESTION # 22
A financial institution (Fl) receives an urgent request for information from the financial intelligence unit (Fl country. According to FATF recommendations, which is the best action for the FI to take?

• A. Establish a committee from different areas of the Fl to determine if the request should be answered.
• B. Request an official court subpoena with details of the investigation.
• C. ling the financing of terrorism that could imply an imminenl threat in the
• D. Provide as much information as possible to the FIU immediately.
• E. Inform the public relations department to prepare for negative news.

Answer: D

Explanation:
Explanation
The correct answer is B because the FATF recommendations state that financial institutions should provide feedback to the FIU as quickly as possible, especially in cases involving the financing of terrorism that could imply an imminent threat to the country. Option A is incorrect because requesting an official court subpoena would delay the response and might not be necessary for the FIU to access the information. Option C is incorrect because establishing a committee would also delay the response and might not be in compliance with the FIU's request. Option D is incorrect because informing the public relations department is irrelevant to the question and might compromise the confidentiality of the investigation.
References: FATF Recommendations, Recommendation 29; Leading Complex Investigations Certificate, Module 4.

NEW QUESTION # 23
In the past 6 months, a small financial institution (Fl) has received regular remittances that are increasing in value from a country with high piracy activity. The Fl's AML officer (AMLO) has also noted that piracy in this country has increased in the same time frame. Which recommendation should the AMLO make?

• A. Request the operations department to return inbound remittances when the sender of funds is from this country.
• B. Upgrade the transaction monitoring system of the Fl to include more fields so that more in-depth information is collected about the inward remittances.
• C. Conduct an in-depth investigation into accumulated remittance information in the past year to find the trend of such transactions.
• D. File a SAR/STR to the appropriate AML authority immediately.

Answer: C

Explanation:
Explanation
Verified answer: D The recommendation that the AMLO should make is to conduct an in-depth investigation into accumulated remittance information in the past year to find the trend of such transactions. This is because the regular and increasing remittances from a country with high piracy activity may indicate a possible link to illicit funds derived from piracy or other criminal activities. According to the World Bank, remittances are often used as a channel for money laundering and terrorist financing, especially when they originate from or are destined to high-risk jurisdictions1. Therefore, the AMLO should analyze the remittance data to identify the sources, destinations, amounts, frequencies, and purposes of the transactions, and compare them with the customer profiles, expected activities, and risk ratings. The AMLO should also review any relevant information from external sources, such as media reports, sanctions lists, or law enforcement alerts, to determine if there are any red flags or indicators of suspicious activity. If the investigation reveals any evidence or suspicion of money laundering or terrorist financing, the AMLO should file a SAR/STR to the appropriate AML authority.
References:
Remittances data - Migration data portal

NEW QUESTION # 24
An EU bank account received 1.8 million EUR from a Swiss bank. The EU bank determines the originator was indicted by U.S. law enforcement, arrested in Switzerland, and extradited for alleged insider trading.
Which is the best reason the EU bank should file a SAR/STR?

• A. The events raise concerns that the payment represents proceeds from insider trading.
• B. The originator was indicted by U.S. law enforcement.
• C. The Swiss bank filed a SAR/STR with the Money Laundering Reporting Office Switzerland.
• D. Insider trading is a predicate offense in the U.S. and Switzerland.

Answer: A

Explanation:
Explanation
The best reason the EU bank should file a SAR/STR is that the events raise concerns that the payment represents proceeds from insider trading, which is a form of market abuse and a predicate offense for money laundering in many jurisdictions. The fact that the originator was indicted by U.S. law enforcement, arrested in Switzerland, and extradited for alleged insider trading indicates that there is a strong suspicion that the funds are derived from criminal activity. The other options are not sufficient reasons to file a SAR/STR, as they do not directly relate to the nature or source of the funds.
References: [Financial Action Task Force Report on Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Risks and Vulnerabilities Associated with Gold], page 17 : [Leading Complex Investigations Certificate], page 12

NEW QUESTION # 25
In which case should an investigator avoid escalating a suspicious event to the chief compliance officer and pursue other channels?

• A. A trade entity engages in complex trade deals involving numerous third-party intermediaries in incongruent lines of business.
• B. An individual involved in a large sum transaction is a foreign PEP.
• C. The transaction chain is likely connected to a known member of a terrorist organization.
• D. A close family member of the chief compliance officer is the beneficiary of a cross-border transfer.

Answer: D

Explanation:
Explanation
An investigator should avoid escalating a suspicious event to the chief compliance officer if there is a potential conflict of interest, such as when a close family member of the officer is involved in the transaction. In such a case, the investigator should pursue other channels, such as reporting to a higher authority or an independent committee. The other options do not present a conflict of interest and should be escalated to the chief compliance officer as part of the normal procedure.
References: Advanced CAMS-FCI Certification Handbook, page 18.

NEW QUESTION # 26
Which reputations risk consequence could a financial entity face for violating AML laws?

• A. Loss of high-profile customers
• B. Increased audit costs to monitor behavior
• C. Monetary penalties
• D. Seizure of assets

Answer: C

NEW QUESTION # 27
CLIENT INFORMATION FORM Client Name: ABC Tech Corp Client I.D. Number: 08125 Name: ABC Tech Corp Registered Address: Mumbai, India Work Address: Mumbai. India Cell Phone: ***"- Alt Phone:
Email: ********
Client Profile Information:
Sector: Financial
Engaged in business from (date): 02 Jan 2020
Sub-sector: Software-Cryptocurrency Exchange
Expected Annual Transaction Amount: 125.000 USD
Payment Nature: Transfer received from client's fund
Received from: Clients
Received for: Sale of digital assets
The client identified themselves as "Cryptocurrency Exchange" Client has submitted the limited liability partnership deed. However, the bank's auditing team is unable to identify the client's exact business profile as the cryptocurrency exchange specified by the client as their major business awaits clearance from the country's regulator. The client has submitted documents/communications exchanged with the regulator and has cited the lack of governing laws in the country of their operation as the reason for the delay.
Investigators determine the ultimate beneficial owner of ABC Tech Corp is a high-net-worth client. The client owns a real estate agency left to her when her spouse died. The spouse provided seed capital for ABC Tech Corp through a direct 1,000.000 Great British Pound (GBP) deposit.
What additional information would trigger filing a SAR/STR?

• A. The client's spouse's source of wealth was a salary of 250,000 GBP per annum for the past 4 years and rental of properties of 150,000 GBP per annum for the past 6 years.
• B. The funds for the seed capital were in the form of 50 cashier's checks of 10,000 GBP each and 50 money orders of 10,000 GBP.
• C. An open-source search revealed that the client's spouse was a PEP.
• D. The client's current net asset value is 8 million GBP, of which 7.5 million GBP was derived from the inheritance.

Answer: B

Explanation:
Explanation
The additional information that would trigger filing a SAR/STR is the fact that the funds for the seed capital were in the form of 50 cashier's checks of 10,000 GBP each and 50 money orders of 10,000 GBP. This is because this indicates a possible attempt to avoid the reporting threshold of 10,000 GBP for cash transactions, which is a common money laundering technique known as structuring or smurfing12. The other options are not necessarily suspicious, as they do not involve cash transactions or indicate any illicit source of funds. The fact that the client's spouse was a PEP does not automatically make the transaction suspicious unless there are other red flags or risk factors associated with the PEP34 References: 1: Money Laundering Techniques 2: Structuring 3: Politically exposed person 4: PEP Definition
& Meaning - Merriam-Webster

NEW QUESTION # 28
During onboarding al Private Bank A, client C indicated that the account would be initially funded with a transfer from Bank B totaling 50 million USD. On which source of funds should Bank A conduct additional scrutiny? (Select Two.)

• A. Third-party transfer
• B. Client's overall wealth
• C. Transfer from Bank B
• D. Client's verified employment income
• E. Documented sale of client properties

Answer: A,C

Explanation:
Explanation
The sources of funds that Bank A should conduct additional scrutiny on are the third-party transfer and the transfer from Bank B. This is because these sources may pose higher risks of money laundering, terrorist financing, fraud, or other illicit activities. Some of the reasons why these sources require more scrutiny are23:
Third-party transfers may involve unknown or unrelated parties that may have ulterior motives or hidden agendas. They may also be used to obscure the origin or destination of funds, or to circumvent sanctions or other regulatory restrictions.
Transfers from Bank B may involve jurisdictions that have weak anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing (AML/CFT) regimes, high levels of corruption, or significant criminal activity. They may also involve banks that have poor reputation, compliance, or transparency standards.
References:
Third Party Payments - Wolfsberg Group
Guidance on Correspondent Banking Services - FATF

NEW QUESTION # 29
Which actions should financial institutions perform to ensure proper data governance? (Select Three.)

• A. Establish an appropriate data management method for collecting and storing information.
• B. Periodically validate integrity and accuracy of information used for IT systems such as customer information, customer identification records, and transaction records.
• C. Ensure the accuracy of customer identification records and transaction records and appropriately manage data as a prerequisite for the effective use of IT systems.
• D. For customers who are determined to be at high risk, review their risk rating and apply risk mitigation measures as appropriate.
• E. Review significant discrepancies between the values of the product reported on the invoice and the fair market value.
• F. Evaluate the nature of foreign remittance under a risk-based structure of AML/CFT and take necessary measures in accordance with the risk-based approach.

Answer: A,B,C

Explanation:
Explanation
Financial institutions should perform the following actions to ensure proper data governance:
Establish an appropriate data management method for collecting and storing information. This is important to ensure that the data is consistent, reliable, and accessible for various purposes, such as risk assessment, compliance reporting, and customer service. Data management methods may include defining data standards, policies, and procedures; implementing data quality controls and validation checks; and using appropriate data storage systems and formats.
Ensure the accuracy of customer identification records and transaction records and appropriately manage data as a prerequisite for the effective use of IT systems. This is important to comply with the anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing (AML/CFT) requirements, such as customer due diligence, transaction monitoring, and suspicious activity reporting. Accurate and complete customer and transaction data also enables financial institutions to use IT systems more effectively for data analysis, risk management, and decision making.
Periodically validate integrity and accuracy of information used for IT systems such as customer information, customer identification records, and transaction records. This is important to ensure that the data remains up-to-date, relevant, and reliable over time. Data validation may include verifying the source and quality of the data; identifying and correcting any errors or inconsistencies; and updating or deleting any obsolete or redundant data.
References:
Data Governance for Financial Institutions - Capgemini
Small and Medium-Sized Deposit-Taking Institutions (SMSBs) Capital and Liquidity Requirements - OSFI

NEW QUESTION # 30
A financial institution <FI> might use which option as intelligence to file a SAR/STR?

• A. The Fl discovers a large number of securities transactions that appear to be related to day trading.
• B. The Fl is unable to obtain evidence of required licensing or registration despite suspicion of money transmitting.
• C. A customer receives a large, one-time wire from a law firm.
• D. A customer makes several deposits in one month that appear to exceed their expected monthly income.

Answer: B

Explanation:
Explanation
The correct answer is C because the FI is unable to obtain evidence of required licensing or registration despite suspicion of money transmitting, which is a red flag for money laundering and a violation of federal and state laws. Option A is incorrect because making several deposits in one month that appear to exceed their expected monthly income might not be indicative of suspicious activity, depending on the customer's profile and source of funds. Option B is incorrect because receiving a large, one-time wire from a law firm might not be indicative of suspicious activity, depending on the customer's relationship with the law firm and the purpose of the wire. Option D is incorrect because discovering a large number of securities transactions that appear to be related to day trading might not be indicative of suspicious activity, depending on the customer's investment strategy and risk tolerance.
References: Money transmitter - Wikipedia; The Quick Guide To Money Transmitter Licenses - Surety Bond Insider; Financial Crime Typologies - Intermediate Certificate, Module 3.

NEW QUESTION # 31
During transaction monitoring. Bank A learns that one of their customers. Med Supplies 123, is attempting to make a payment via wire totaling 382,500 USD to PPE Business LLC located in Mexico to purchase a large order of personal protective equipment. specifically surgical masks and face shields. Upon further verification.
Bank A decides to escalate and refers the case to investigators.
Bank A notes that, days prior to the above transaction, the same customer went to a Bank A location to wire
1,215,280 USD to Breath Well LTD located in Singapore. Breath Well was acting as an intermediary to purchase both 3-ply surgical masks and face shields from China. Bank A decided not to complete the transaction due to concerns with the involved supplier in China. Moreover, the customer is attempting to send a third wire in the amount of 350,000 USD for the purchase of these items, this time using a different vendor in China. The investigator must determine next steps in the investigation and what actions, if any. should be taken against relevant parties.
Upon further investigation. Bank As investigator learns that both the Mexico- and Singapore-based companies are linked to the alleged suppliers in China. Which additional indicators would the investigator need to identify to determine if this fits a fentanyl (drug) trafficking typology? (Select Two.)

• A. Review of the account activity reveals that account is inconsistent with the expected business activity as it shows multiple charges at various hotels, transportation tickets for unrelated 3rd parties, etc.
• B. Review of the account activity reveals that wires were mainly funded by multiple cash deposits, conducted in amounts of 10.000 USD or below.
• C. Review of the invoices and transportation documents, provided by the customer, reveal significant discrepancies between the description of goods.
  Internet research reveals that suppliers are newly established companies with no history of sales of medical equipment.
• D. Review of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) product certifications provided by the customer reveals that documents were falsified.

Answer: C,D

NEW QUESTION # 32
SAR/STR NARRATIVE
A SAR/STR has been submitted on five transactions conducted on the correspondent banking relationship with ABC Bank.
Client Information:
Remitter information: DEF Oil Resource Ltd. is the oldest member of the DEF Group. It was founded in 1977 as a general trading business with a primary focus on exports from Africa and North America. The group has business activities that span the entire energy value chain. Their core field of endeavor is centered within the oil and gas industry and its associated sub-sectors.
Beneficiary Information:
As per the response received from ABC Bank, it was determined that the beneficiaries are related to DEF Oil Resource Ltd. These were created by DEF Oil Resource Ltd. to purchase property in a foreign country on behalf of their senior management as part of a bonus scheme. The purpose behind this payment was for purchase of property in another country.
Payment Reference:
ABCXXXXX31PZFG2H
ABCXXXXXX51PQGEH
ABCXXXXXX214QWVG
ABCXXXXXX41PSXA2
ABCXXXXXX815QWS3
Concerns:
* We are unsure about the country of incorporation of the beneficiaries.
* We are concerned about the transactional activity since the payment made towards entities (conducted on behalf of individuals) appears to be possible tax evasion.
* There appears to be an attempt to conceal the identity of individuals (senior management), which again raises concerns about the source of funds.
* Referring to the response received from ABC Bank, we are unclear about the ultimate beneficiary of funds.
* The remitter is involved in a high-risk business, (i.e., oil and crude products trading), and the beneficiary is involved in a real estate business which again poses a higher risk.
The monitoring system of the correspondent institution flags the transaction as suspicious activity. The correspondent bank needs to send a request for information to the respondent bank. Which elements should be included in the request? (Select Three.)

• A. The last 6 months of transactional history
• B. The account profile of the customer and their KYC data
• C. Details of DEF Oil Resource Ltd parent company and the name(s) of the beneficial owner(s)
• D. Full transaction history of the correspondent bank's customer
• E. The respondent bank's customer's senior management bonus plan
• F. The contract pertaining to the purchase of property in another country

Answer: B,C,F

Explanation:
Explanation
The request for information should include the following elements:
Details of DEF Oil Resource Ltd parent company and the name(s) of the beneficial owner(s) (Option A): This is necessary to verify the identity and ownership structure of the remitter and to assess the risk level of the customer and the transaction.
The account profile of the customer and their KYC data (Option C): This is necessary to understand the nature and purpose of the customer's business relationship with the respondent bank and to compare it with the observed transactional activity.
The contract pertaining to the purchase of property in another country (Option E): This is necessary to verify the legitimacy and source of funds for the transaction and to identify the ultimate beneficiary of funds.
The other options are not relevant or necessary for the request for information. The full transaction history of the correspondent bank's customer (Option B) is too broad and may not be related to suspicious activity. The respondent bank's customer's senior management bonus plan (Option D) is not relevant to the transaction and may not be available to the respondent bank. The last 6 months of transactional history (Option F) is also too broad and may not be related to the suspicious activity.
References:
Advanced CAMS-FCI Certification Handbook, page 19

NEW QUESTION # 33
A financial institution (Fl) banks a money transmitter business (MTB) located in Miami. The MTB regularly initiates wire transfers with the ultimate beneficiary in Cuba and legally sells travel packages to Cuba. The wire transfers for money remittances comply with the country's economic sanctions policies. A Fl investigator on the sanctions team reviews each wire transfer to ensure compliance with sanctions and to monitor transfer details.
An airline located in Cuba, unrelated to the business, legally sells airline tickets in Cuba to Cuban citizens wanting to travel outside of Cuba. The airline tickets are purchased using Cuban currency (CUC).
The MTB wants 100,000 USD worth of CUC. Purchasing CUC from a Cuban bank includes a 4% fee. The MTB contacts the airline to ask if the airline will trade its CUC for USD at a lower exchange fee than the Cuban bank. The airline agrees to a 1% fee. The MTB initiates a wire transfer to the airline which appears as normal activity in the monitoring system because of the business' travel package sales.
The investigator recommends that a SAR/STR be filed. What documentation should be referenced in the SAR/STR filing? (Select Three.)

• A. Account documentation on all related accounts maintained by the MTB
• B. All documents related to the agreement between the airline and the MTB
• C. Cumulative dollar amount of the wire transfer activity
• D. Cumulative dollar amount for transactions listing for all the MTB account's wire activity regarding travel packages
• E. Licensing information regarding the travel agency providing tourist sales to Cuba
• F. Airline's ticket sales and passenger list

Answer: C

Explanation:
Explanation
The most likely reason for conducting a reverse transaction is to conceal or launder illicit funds. A reverse transaction is a transaction that reverses a previous transaction, such as a refund, a chargeback, or a cancellation. Reverse transactions can be used by money launderers to obscure the source, ownership, or destination of funds, or to create false records or invoices. For example, a money launderer may initiate a wire transfer from a high-risk jurisdiction to a low-risk jurisdiction, and then reverse the transaction after receiving confirmation of the funds. This way, the money launderer can create a paper trail that shows legitimate funds coming from a low-risk jurisdiction, while hiding the true origin of the funds.
References: Advanced CAMS-FCI Study Guide, page 40-41.

NEW QUESTION # 34
SAR/STR NARRATIVE
A SAR/STR has been submitted on five transactions conducted on the correspondent banking relationship with ABC Bank.
Client Information:
Remitter information: DEF Oil Resource Ltd. is the oldest member of the DEF Group. It was founded in 1977 as a general trading business with a primary focus on exports from Africa and North America. The group has business activities that span the entire energy value chain. Their core field of endeavor is centered within the oil and gas industry and its associated sub-sectors.
Beneficiary Information:
As per the response received from ABC Bank, it was determined that the beneficiaries are related to DEF Oil Resource Ltd. These were created by DEF Oil Resource Ltd. to purchase property in a foreign country on behalf of their senior management as part of a bonus scheme. The purpose behind this payment was for the purchase of property in another country.
Payment Reference:
ABCXXXXX31PZFG2H
ABCXXXXXX51PQGEH
ABCXXXXXX214QWVG
ABCXXXXXX41PSXA2
ABCXXXXXX815QWS3
Concerns:
* We are unsure about the country of incorporation of the beneficiaries.
* We are concerned about the transactional activity since the payment made towards entities (conducted on behalf of individuals) appears to be possible tax evasion.
* There appears to be an attempt to conceal the identity of individuals (senior management), which again raises concerns about the source of funds.
* Referring to the response received from ABC Bank, we are unclear about the ultimate beneficiary of funds.
* The remitter is involved in a high-risk business, (i.e., oil and crude products trading), and the beneficiary is involved in real estate business which again poses a higher risk.
When drafting the SAR/STR narrative, the investigator notes several payment references. What additional information should the investigator include in the narrative?

• A. All relevant tables, spreadsheets, and other supporting documentation
• B. The investigator's concerns based on their subjective opinion
• C. The suspicious accounts and transactions identified
• D. Personal tax records pertinent to the owners to indicate tax evasion

Answer: C

Explanation:
Explanation
The SAR/STR narrative should include the suspicious accounts and transactions identified, as well as the reasons why they are considered suspicious. The narrative should provide a clear and concise description of the activity, the parties involved, the dates, amounts, and frequencies of the transactions, and any other relevant information that would assist law enforcement in understanding the nature and purpose of the activity.
The narrative should not include the investigator's subjective opinion, personal tax records, or supporting documentation that is not essential to explain the suspicious activity. Supporting documentation can be attached separately to the SAR/STR form or provided upon request by law enforcement.

NEW QUESTION # 35
A client that runs a non-profit organization that aids refugees in leaving their home countries received a remittance from a money services business that was ten times the average. The client was recently detained for providing falsified passports to illegal immigrants. Which predicate offenses could be considered in the SAR/STR? (Select Two.)

• A. Narcotics trafficking
• B. Tax evasion
• C. Antiques smuggling
• D. Human smuggling/trafficking
• E. Terrorist financing

Answer: D,E

Explanation:
Explanation
The correct answer is A and B because human smuggling/trafficking and terrorist financing are both predicate offenses for money laundering that could be related to the client's activities. Option C is incorrect because there is no indication of narcotics trafficking in the scenario. Option D is incorrect because there is no indication of antiques smuggling in the scenario. Option E is incorrect because there is no indication of tax evasion in the scenario.
References: Advanced CAMS-FCI Certification Handbook, page 10; Financial Crime Typologies - Intermediate Certificate, Module 2.

NEW QUESTION # 36
......

Pass ACAMS CAMS-FCI Exam in First Attempt Easily: https://dumpstorrent.prep4surereview.com/CAMS-FCI-latest-braindumps.html